Infective Endocarditis

Revision as of 22:51, 28 November 2013 by NiloferT (talk | contribs)

Introduction

Infective endocarditis (IE) is an infectious and inflammatory process of endothelial lining of the heart structures and valves. It is most commonly caused by bacterial and fungal infections, although non-infective causes of endocarditis occur, this chapter will concentrate on infective causes.

Epidemiology

The global incidence of endocarditis varies in literature with a wide range of 3 to 9 cases per 100,000 person years[1]. Although it appears that in the elderly population the incidence rate is remarkably higher reaching 20.4 cases per 100,000 person years[2]. This is likely related to increased hospitalization, valve replacement surgeries and intra-cardiac instrumentation in the elderly population. In addition to aging, the prevalence of chronic diseases predisposing to bacteremias such as human immunodeficiency syndrome, end-stage renal disease, organ transplantations and diabetes have also increased. IE is a dreaded complication of intravenous drug use, most commonly affecting the tricuspid valve, with a yearly incidence of 1-5% among chronic users[3]. IE related to implantable rhythm devices remains relatively low but is on the rise due to increased patient population requiring rhythm devices[4].

Pathogenesis and Causes

Generally, endothelial damage to heart valves predisposes to bacterial infections as it is generally resistant to bacterial infections. This may be caused by turbulent blood flow in damaged valves, septal defects or instrumentation. Although, recent evidence suggests that A-type von Willebrand factor may contribute to S. aureus binding in endothelial intact valves[5]. Specifically, in patients with S. aureus bacteremia, native valve endocarditis was reported to be in 19% of patients, and 38% in those with prosthetic valves[6].

While many microorganisms have been implicated in endocarditis syndromes, few infectious bacteria account for the majority of cases.

Staphylococcal endocarditis is most commonly caused by S.aureus. It is the most lethal organism implicated in endocarditis with mortality rates approaching 37%[7]. S.aureus is a highly virulent organism and may cause significant valve destruction, abscess formation, conduction abnormalities and embolization. It often enters the bloodstream from the nares or skin. Patients with left sided involvement often require surgery. In intravenous drug users is the most common cause of IE[8]. Patients who are found to have Staphylococcal bacteremia should undergo echocardiography to rule out endocarditis. The prevalence of endocarditis in patients with S.aureus bacteremia was reported in 19% and 38% in those with native and prosthetic valves respectively[9].

S. epidermidis is an important cause of prosthetic valve endocarditis and is associated with a particularly high incidence of heart failure and valvular abscess formation and a mortality rate of 36%[10].

Viridans group streptococcus often account for 30% of community acquired native valve endocarditis[11]. They are part of the oral cavity flora and may gain entry into the bloodstream via dental caries or trauma. The virulence is generally low and eradication rates are high.

Streptococcus bovis is part of the lower gastrointestinal and urinary tract and is commonly implicated in underlying colorectal disease if found to be the cause of endocarditis. Patients who are found to have S.bovis endocarditis should undergo a colonoscopy to exclude colorectal malignancy or polyps.

Enterococcal endocarditis is part of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary flora and is often implicated in patients in patients undergoing genitourinary or gastrointestinal procedures. Enterococcal endocarditis is generally difficult to treat due to high rates of antibiotic resistance and often require multi-drug regimen.

Gram negative bacilli IE is rather uncommon, the HACEK organisms (Haemophillus spp, Actinobacillus, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella spp) are responsible for approximately 3% of endocarditis cases and are the most common cause for gram negative endocarditis in non-intravenous drug users[12]. Non-HACEK organisms are a rare cause for endocarditis and only account for <1-2% of causes.

Fungal endocarditis occurs in patients who receive prolonged parenteral nutrition or antibiotics through intravenous catheters. It has also been described in intravenous drug users. Patients are often immunocompromised. The most common organisms implicated are Candida species, Histoplasma capsulatum, and Aspergillus. Mortality rates associated with fungal endocarditis exceed 80%[13].

 
Large lesions on non coronary and left coronary cusps normal valves otherwise
 
Vegetations on tricuspid valve
 
Septic emboli to the conjunctiva

Diagnosis

Several diagnostic criteria have been proposed for the diagnosis of IE. In clinical practice, it is the global clinical picture that leads to decision making in the diagnosis and treatment of endocarditis. The modified DUKE criteria for diagnosis is often widely used, with a sensitivity and specificity approaching ~80%.[14] The DUKE criteria divides into Definite IE, Possible IE, or Rejected IE. It uses Major criteria (microbiology, valvular abnormalities) and Minor criteria (systemic symptoms described below). Using the diagnostic criteria for IE should not override clinical judgment.

Definite IE:

  • Pathologic Criteria:
    • Microorganisms demonstrated by culture or histologic examination of vegetation, a vegetation that has embolized, or an intracardiac abscess specimen OR pathologic lesions; vegetation or intracardiac abscess confirmed by histologic examination showing active endocarditis
  • Clinical Criteria
    • 2 major criteria OR 1 major and 3 minor criteria OR 5 minor criteria

Possible IE:

  • 1 Major criterion + 1 Minor criterion OR 3 minor criteria

Rejected IE:

  • Firm alternate diagnosis explaining evidence of IE OR
  • Resolution of IE syndrome with =<4 days of antibiotics therapy OR
  • No pathologic evidence of IE at surgery or autopsy with antibiotic therapy for =<4 days OR
  • Does not meet criteria for IE, as above
Major Criteria (microbiology)
Typical organisms x 2 blood cultures e.g S. viridans, S. bovis, HACEK (Haemophilus spp, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella spp, Kingella kingae), S. aureus, Enterecoccus with no primary source
Persistent bacteremia With blood cultures drawn >12 hours apart OR 3 out of 3, or 3 out of 4 positive blood cultures
Single positive blood culture for Coxiella burnetti or antiphase I IgG antibody titer >1:800
Major Criteria (valve)
Echocardiogram with evidence of vegetation TTE or TEE
New valvular regurgitation
Minor Criteria
Predisposing cardiac condition or IV drug use
Fever >38 degrees celsius or

>100.4 fahrenheit)

Vascular phenomena major arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, conjunctival hemorrhage, janeway lesions
Immune phenomena glomerulonephritis, Osler nodes, Roth spots, positive RF
Positive blood culture not meeting above major criteria or serological evidence of active infection with organism consistent with IE

The sensitivity of detecting on echocardiogram varies. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogram sensitivities for detecting vegetations are 50% and 90% respectively.[15]

Endocarditis of prosthetic mitral valve
http://www.echopedia.org/images/2/24/E00404.swf http://www.echopedia.org/images/6/6a/E00405.swf
Endocarditis of the aortic valve
http://www.echopedia.org/images/1/10/E00114.swf http://www.echopedia.org/images/5/5b/E00117.swf
Roth Spots
 

Therapy

Empiric therapy for infective endocarditis should only be used when there is a high index of suspicion in the absence of positive blood cultures. Three blood cultures should be drawn 30 minutes apart prior to initiating treatment. When there a high clinical probability of infective endocarditis in acute settings, empiric therapy is geared towards MRSA and coagulase negative staphylococcus. In healthcare settings and in injection drug users coverage should also include gram negative bacilli. Options for such therapy include Vancomycin + Gentamicin or, Nafcillin/Oxacillin + Tobramycin/Gentamicin.

When considering coverage for subacute endocarditis, coveraged is geared more towards streprococci spp. Options commonly include Ampicillin/Sulbactam + Gentamicin/Tobramycin, or Ceftriaxone + Vancomycin.

As soon as blood cultures become available antibiotics should be adjusted to target the identified microorganisms.

In cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), microbiological activity depends on early (<2 months post op) or late (>2 months post op). In early PVE S.aureus accounts for 40% of the cases, followed by coagulase negative staphylococcus (17%). In late PVE coagulase negative staphylococcus accounts for 20% of cases, followed by S. aureus (18%). Coverage for enterococci, streptococci, and gram negative should be considered in empiric therapy in both groups. Rifampin + Vancomycin + Gentamicin should be initiated for PVE <12 post op. Suspected PVE >12 months post op may be treated with the same regimen as for native valves.[16]

The American Heart Association recommendation for specific antimicrobial therapy is shown below: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/111/23/3167.full

The guidelines on treatment of endocarditis from the task force for treatment of Infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology is shown below: http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/19/2369.long

Prophylaxis

According the American Heart Association guidelines published in 2007 the following groups of patients are considered to be high-risk and require prophylaxis:[17]

  • Any prosthetic heart valve, or prosthetic material used for valve repair
  • Previous infective endocarditis
  • Congenital heart disease (CHD)
    • Unrepaired cyanotic CHD, including all palliative shunts and conduits
    • Completely repaired congenital heart defect with prosthetic material or device, whether placed by surgery or by catheter intervention, during the first 6 months after the procedure
    • Repaired CHD with residual defects at the site or adjacent to the site of a prosthetic patch or prosthetic device (which inhibit endothelialization)
  • Cardiac transplantation recipients who develop cardiac valvulopathy
  • Dental procedures require prophylaxis:
    • Manipulation of gingival tissue, or the periapical region of teeth or perforation of oral mucosa
  • Respiratory tract procedures require prophylaxis:
    • Incision or biopsy of the respiratory mucosa, or procedures involving treatment of abscess of empyema

Antibiotic prophylaxis is also recommended for any procedures on infected skin/skin structures or musculoskeletal tissue in high risk patients.[18]

Complications of Endocarditis

Common complications arising from IE can be divided into local and systemic. Local complications often arise from direct extension of the infection into cardiac structures. Systemic complications arise from embolization and bacteremias.

Heart failure occurs in 26-30% of patients with endocarditis.[19] It may occur acutely or over time, it is often times due to anatomical disruption from valve vegetations or destruction of nearby tissue. Development of heart failure in the setting of IE is correlated with worse outcomes. Heart failure occurs most commonly with aortic (29%) and mitral valve (20%) infections and less with tricuspid valve (8%).[20] The overall in hospital mortality rate for patients diagnosed with heart failure approaches 30%.[21]

Conduction abnormalities, commonly characterized by heart blocks in endocarditis are associated with infection extension, increased risk of embolization and increased mortality. They are reported to be present in 26%-28% of patients.[22]

Embolization is a dreaded complication of IE and most commonly affects the spleen, brain, kidneys in cases of left sided endocarditis, and the lung in right sided endocarditis. Studies report a rate of 8.5-25% and are associated with significant mortality risk.[23] Vegetation length, especially >10mm, infection with S. aureus, S. bovis are predictive factors for a higher rate of embolization and increased in mortality.[24] Embolization to the brain can result in mycotic aneurysms which can present with a variety of neurologic manifestations depending on the anatomic location and spread of infection in the surrounding area. Up to 30% of patients with evidence of embolization to the brain are reported to be asymptomatic.[25]

Prognosis

Prognosis of IE is largely dependent on the patient’s comorbid conditions such as diabetes,[26] hemodialysis, congestive heart failure,[27] complications of endocarditis, prosthetic valve and the microorganism identified. Generally the outcome largely depends on the organism involved. According to recent data it, the over 30 day mortality is ~15% and the 1-year mortality is ~34%.[28] Prosthetic valve endocarditis has a significant in hospital mortality of ~24%,[29] while native valve endocarditis carries a lower in hospital mortality of 12% if treated early and surgically.[30]

References

  1. "Infective Endocarditis — NEJM." 2013. 12 Sep. 2013 <http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcp1206782>

    [i]
  2. Cabell CH, Fowler VG, Jr, Engemann JJ, et al. Endocarditis in the elderly: Incidence, surgery, and survival in 16,921 patients over 12 years. Circulation.2002;106(19):547.

    [ii]
  3. Miró, José M, Ana del Rı́o, and Carlos A Mestres. "Infective endocarditis in intravenous drug abusers and HIV-1 infected patients." Infectious disease clinics of North America 16.2 (2002): 273-295.

    [iii]
  4. Ipek, Esra Gucuk et al. "Infections of implantable cardiac rhythm devices: predisposing factors and outcome." Acta cardiologica 67.3 (2012): 303.

    [iv]
  5. Pappelbaum, Karin I et al. "Ultra-Large von Willebrand Factor Fibers Mediate Luminal Staphylococcus Aureus Adhesion to an Intact Endothelial Cell Layer under Shear Stress." Circulation (2013).

    [v]
  6. Rasmussen RV, Høst U, Arpi M, Hassager C, Johansen HK, Korup E, Schønheyder HC, Berning J, Gill S, Rosenvinge FS, Fowler VG Jr, Møller JE, Skov RL, Larsen CT, Hansen TF, Mard S, Smit J, Andersen PS, and Bruun NE. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: the value of screening with echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Jun;12(6):414-20. DOI:10.1093/ejechocard/jer023 | PubMed ID:21685200 | HubMed [vi]
  7. Duval, Xavier et al. "Temporal Trends in Infective Endocarditis in the Context of Prophylaxis Guideline ModificationsThree Successive Population-Based Surveys." Journal of the American College of Cardiology 59.22 (2012): 1968-1976.

    [vii]
  8. Miro JM, Anguera I, Cabell CH, Chen AY, Stafford JA, Corey GR, Olaison L, Eykyn S, Hoen B, Abrutyn E, Raoult D, Bayer A, Fowler VG Jr, and International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database Study Group. Staphylococcus aureus native valve infective endocarditis: report of 566 episodes from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Aug 15;41(4):507-14. DOI:10.1086/431979 | PubMed ID:16028160 | HubMed [viii]
  9. Rasmussen, Rasmus V et al. "Prevalence of infective endocarditis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: the value of screening with echocardiography." European Journal of Echocardiography 12.6 (2011): 414-420.

    [ix]
  10. Lalani, T et al. "Prosthetic valve endocarditis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci: findings from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database." European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 25.6 (2006): 365-368.

    [x]
  11. McDonald, Jay R. "Acute infective endocarditis." Infectious disease clinics of North America 23.3 (2009): 643-664.

    [xi]
  12. Das, MD, M et al. "Infective endocarditis caused by HACEK microorganisms." Annual review of medicine 48.1 (1997): 25-33.

    [xii]
  13. Baddour, Larry M et al. "Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: Endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America." Circulation 111.23 (2005): e394-e434.

    [xiii]
  14. Li, Jennifer S et al. "Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis." Clinical infectious diseases 30.4 (2000): 633-638.

    [xiv]
  15. "Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective ..." 2012. 20 Nov. 2013 <http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/19/2369/T17.expansion.html>

    [xvii]
  16. Wilson, Walter et al. "Prevention of Infective Endocarditis Guidelines From the American Heart Association: A Guideline From the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group." Circulation 116.15 (2007): 1736-1754.

    [xviii]
  17. Wilson, Walter et al. "Prevention of Infective Endocarditis Guidelines From the American Heart Association: A Guideline From the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group." Circulation 116.15 (2007): 1736-1754.

    [xix]
  18. Baddour, Larry M et al. "Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: Endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America." Circulation 111.23 (2005): e394-e434.

    [xxii]
  19. Kiefer, T, and T Kiefer. "Article - JAMA Network." 2011. <https://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1104665&link=xref>

    [xxiii]
  20. Meine, Trip J et al. "Cardiac conduction abnormalities in endocarditis defined by the Duke criteria." American heart journal 142.2 (2001): 280-285.

    [xxiv]
  21. Thuny, Franck et al. "Risk of Embolism and Death in Infective Endocarditis: Prognostic Value of Echocardiography A Prospective Multicenter Study." Circulation 112.1 (2005): 69-75.

    [xxvii]
  22. Snygg-Martin U, Gustafsson L, Rosengren L, Alsiö A, Ackerholm P, Andersson R, and Olaison L. Cerebrovascular complications in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis are common: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging and neurochemical brain damage markers. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 1;47(1):23-30. DOI:10.1086/588663 | PubMed ID:18491965 | HubMed [xxviii]
  23. Kourany WM, Miro JM, Moreno A, Corey GR, Pappas PA, Abrutyn E, Hoen B, Habib G, Fowler VG Jr, Sexton DJ, Olaison L, Cabell CH, and ICE MD Investigators. Influence of diabetes mellitus on the clinical manifestations and prognosis of infective endocarditis: a report from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Merged Database. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38(8):613-9. DOI:10.1080/00365540600617017 | PubMed ID:16857604 | HubMed [xxix]
  24. Nakagawa, Tom et al. "Clinical features of infective endocarditis: Comparison between the 1990s and 2000s." Journal of cardiology (2013).

    [xxx]
  25. Bikdeli, Behnood et al. "Trends in Hospitalization Rates and Outcomes of Endocarditis among Medicare Beneficiaries." Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2013).

    [xxxi]
  26. Wang, Andrew et al. "The use and effect of surgical therapy for prosthetic valve infective endocarditis: a propensity analysis of a multicenter, international cohort." American heart journal 150.5 (2005): 1086-1091.

    [xxxii]
  27. Lalani, Tahaniyat et al. "Analysis of the impact of early surgery on in-hospital mortality of native valve endocarditis use of propensity score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias." Circulation 121.8 (2010): 1005-1013.

    [xxxiii]
  28. Evangelista, A, and MT Gonzalez-Alujas. "Echocardiography in infective endocarditis." Heart 90.6 (2004): 614-617.

    [xv]
  29. Mügge A, Daniel WG, Frank G, and Lichtlen PR. Echocardiography in infective endocarditis: reassessment of prognostic implications of vegetation size determined by the transthoracic and the transesophageal approach. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Sep;14(3):631-8. DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(89)90104-6 | PubMed ID:2768712 | HubMed [xvi]
  30. [xx]
  31. Hollanders, G et al. "A six years review on 53 cases of infective endocarditis: clinical, microbiological and therapeutical features." Acta cardiologica 43.2 (1987): 121-132.

    [xxi]
  32. Homma, Shunichi, and Cairistine Grahame-Clarke. "Toward reducing embolic complications from endocarditis." Journal of the American College of Cardiology 42.5 (2003): 781-783.

    [xxv]
  33. Hubert, Sandrine et al. "Prediction of Symptomatic Embolism in Infective EndocarditisConstruction and Validation of a Risk Calculator in a Multicenter Cohort." Journal of the American College of Cardiology 62.15 (2013): 1384-1392.

    [xxvi]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed