Heart Failure: Difference between revisions

2,687 bytes removed ,  6 June 2012
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 184: Line 184:
|-
|-
| '''Measurement'''
| '''Measurement'''
| '''Abnormality'''
| width="400px"|'''Abnormality'''
| '''Clinical implications'''
| '''Clinical implications'''
|-
|-
Line 192: Line 192:
|-
|-
| LV ejection fraction
| LV ejection fraction
| Akinesis, hypokinesis, dyskinesis
|  
| Myocardial infarction/ischaemia, cardiomyopathy, myocarditis
*Akinesis
*Hypokinesis
*Dyskinesis
|  
*Myocardial infarction/ischaemia
*Cardiomyopathy
*Myocarditis
|-
|-
| End-diastolic diameter
| End-diastolic diameter
| Increased (>55 – 60 mm)
| Increased (>55 – 60 mm)
| Volume overload
|  
HF likely
*Volume overload
*HF likely
|-
|-
| End-systolic diameter
| End-systolic diameter
| Increased (>45 mm)
| Increased (>45 mm)
| Volume overload
|  
HF likely
*Volume overload
*HF likely
|-
|-
| Fractional shortening
| Fractional shortening
Line 211: Line 219:
| Left atrial size
| Left atrial size
| Increased (>40 mm)  
| Increased (>40 mm)  
| Increased filling pressures, mitral valve dysfunction, atrial fibrillation
|  
*Increased filling pressures
*Mitral valve dysfunction
*Atrial fibrillation
|-
|-
| Left ventricular thickness
| Left ventricular thickness
| Hypertrophy (>11 – 12 mm)
| Hypertrophy (>11 – 12 mm)
| Hypertention, aortic stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
|  
*Hypertention
*Aortic stenosis
*Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
|-
|-
| Valvular structure and function
| Valvular structure and function
| Valvular stenosis or regurgitation (especially aortic stenosis and mitral insufficiency)
| Valvular stenosis or regurgitation (especially aortic stenosis and mitral insufficiency)
| May be primary cause of HF or complicating factor  
|  
Asses haemodynamic consequences
*May be primary cause of HF or complicating factor  
Consider surgery
*Asses haemodynamic consequences
*Consider surgery
|-
|-
| Mitral diastolic flow profile
| Mitral diastolic flow profile
Line 229: Line 244:
| Tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity
| Tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity
| Increased (>3 m/s)
| Increased (>3 m/s)
| Increased right ventricular systolic pressure
|  
Suspect pulmonary hypertention
*Increased right ventricular systolic pressure
*Suspect pulmonary hypertention
|-
|-
| Pericardium
| Pericardium
| Effusion, haemopericardium, thickening
|  
| Consider tamponade, uraemia, malignancy, systemic disease, acute or chronic pericarditis, contrictive pericarditis
*Effusion
*Haemopericardium
*Thickening
|  
*Consider tamponade
*Uraemia
*Malignancy
*Systemic disease
*Acute or chronic pericarditis
*Contrictive pericarditis
|-
|-
| Aortic outflow velocity time integral  
| Aortic outflow velocity time integral  
Line 242: Line 267:
| Inferior vena caval  
| Inferior vena caval  
| Dilated retrograde flow  
| Dilated retrograde flow  
| Increased right atrial pressures, right ventricular dysfunction, hepatic congestion
|  
*Increased right atrial pressures
*Right ventricular dysfunction
*Hepatic congestion
|}
|}
</div>
</div>
Line 271: Line 299:


===== Alcohol and tobacco =====
===== Alcohol and tobacco =====
Alcohol intake should be minimized, as it may increase blood pressure and/or have a negative inotropic effect. (Class IIa recommendation, level of evidence C) Smoking cessation should be encouraged. It is recommended that patients with HF receive support and advice on this topic. (Class I recommendation, level of evidence C). A reduction in alcohol and tobacco intake might also improve co-morbidities including sleep disorders.
Alcohol intake should be minimized, as it may increase blood pressure and/or have a negative inotropic effect. (Class II a recommendation, level of evidence C) Smoking cessation should be encouraged. It is recommended that patients with HF receive support and advice on this topic. (Class I recommendation, level of evidence C). A reduction in alcohol and tobacco intake might also improve co-morbidities including sleep disorders.


===== Exercise =====
===== Exercise =====
Line 340: Line 368:
Possible side effects include symptomatic hypotension or drug-induced lupus-like syndrome.
Possible side effects include symptomatic hypotension or drug-induced lupus-like syndrome.
==== Other ====  
==== Other ====  
Anticoagulants, anti platelet agents, statins, anti arrhythmic medication, calcium antagonists.
*Anticoagulants  
*Anti platelet agents
*Statins
*Anti arrhythmic medication
*Calcium antagonists


=== Management of HF patients with preserved LVEF (HFPEF) ===
=== Management of HF patients with preserved LVEF (HFPEF) ===
To date, no evidence exists of any treatment reducing morbidity or mortality in this patient group. With the aim to control water and sodium retention and decrease breathlessness and edema, diuretics are prescribed to HFPEF patients.  
To date, no evidence exists of any treatment reducing morbidity or mortality in this patient group. With the aim to control water and sodium retention and decrease breathlessness and edema, diuretics are prescribed to HFPEF patients.  
{| class="wikitable" border="1" align="left" style="float: center"
 
<div align="center">
{| class="wikitable" border="1" width="90%" cellpading="2" cellspacing="2"
|-
|-
| colspan="6" | '''Table 4'''
|colspan="6" align="center" bgcolor="#E3E4FA"|'''Table 4'''
|-
|-
| colspan="6" align="center" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; background-color: white;" | '''Size of treatment effect'''
| colspan="6"| '''Size of treatment effect'''
|-
|-
| rowspan="6" width="100" style="border-right: 0; border-top: 0; background-color: white;" | '''Estimate of Certainty (precision) of treatment effect
| rowspan="6" width="50px"| '''Estimate of Certainty (precision) of treatment effect'''
| rowspan="2" valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" |  
 
| valign="top" width="250" style="border-bottom: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | '''Class I'''
|||valign="top"|'''Class I'''
 
Benefit >>> Risk
Benefit >>> Risk
| valign="top" width="250" style="border-bottom: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | '''Class IIa'''
 
|valign="top"|'''Class IIa'''
 
Benefit >> Risk
Benefit >> Risk
Additional studies with focused objectives needed
Additional studies with focused objectives needed
| valign="top" width="250" style="border-bottom: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | '''Class IIb'''
 
|valign="top"|'''Class IIb'''
 
Benefit ≥  Risk'''
Benefit ≥  Risk'''
Additional studies with broad objectives needed; additional registry data would be helpful
Additional studies with broad objectives needed; additional registry data would be helpful
| valign="top" width="250" style="border-bottom: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | '''Class III'''
 
|valign="top"|'''Class III'''
 
Benefit ≥ Risk
Benefit ≥ Risk
No additional studies needed
No additional studies needed
|-
|-
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | Procedure/treatment should be performed/administered
|||Procedure/treatment should be performed/administered
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | It is reasonable to perform/administer treatment
| It is reasonable to perform/administer treatment
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | Procedure/treatment may be considered
| Procedure/treatment may be considered
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | Procedure/treatment should not be performed/administered since it is not helpful and may be harmful
| Procedure/treatment should not be performed/administered since it is not helpful and may be harmful
|-  
|-  
| valign="top" width="200" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | '''Level A'''
| '''Level A'''
 
Multiple (3-5) population risk strata evaluated
| Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective
 
Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or non-randomized trials


| Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective


Multiple (3-5) population risk strata evaluated
Some conflicting evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective


- Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or non-randomized trials
| Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective


- Some conflicting evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
Greater conflicting evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established


- Greater conflicting evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
| Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful


- Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
|-  
|-  
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | '''Level B'''
| '''Level B'''
 
Limited (2-3) population risk strata evaluated


| Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective


Limited (2-3) population risk strata evaluated
Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | - Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective
 
| Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective
 
Some conflicting evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies


- Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
| Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | - Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective


- Some conflicting evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies  
Greater conflicting evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | - Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established


- Greater conflicting evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
| Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful
| valign="top" style="border-bottom: 0; border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: #CCCCFF;" | - Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful


- Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
|-  
|-  
| valign="top" style="border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | '''Level C'''
| '''Level C'''
 
Very limited (1-2) population risk strata evaluated
 
| Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective


Only experts opinion, case studies, or standard-of-care


Very limited (1-2) population risk strata evaluated
| Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective
| valign="top" style="border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective
 
Only diverging expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care


- Only experts opinion, case studies, or standard-of-care
| Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established
| valign="top" style="border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective


- Only diverging expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care  
Only diverging expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care
| valign="top" style="border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established


- Only diverging expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care
| Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful
| valign="top" style="border-top: 0; border-left: 0; border-right: 0; background-color: white;" | - Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful


- Only expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care
Only expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care
|}
|}
 
</div>
{{clr}}
{{clr}}


467

edits